|
Luminosity, Inc.
Delivering Exceptional
Justice Solutions
|
|
|
Luminosity, Inc. Completes Largest Ever National Research
Study on Pretrial Risk Assessment and Alternatives to Pretrial
Detention
|
|
|
Pretrial Risk Assessment in the Federal Court
For the
Purpose of Expanding the
Use of
Alternatives to Detention
Saint Petersburg, Florida, May 1, 2009 -
Luminosity, Inc. is proud to
announce the release of a cutting edge research report "Pretrial
Risk Assessment in the Federal Court - For the Purpose of Expanding
the Use of Alternatives to Detention." The research
was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the
Federal Detention Trustee (OFDT) with support from the Administrative
Office of the U.S. Courts.
The study employed data provided by the Administrative Office of the
U.S. Courts, Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (OPPS) that
described all persons charged with criminal offenses in the federal
courts between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2007 who were
processed by the federal pretrial services system (N=565,178).
All federal districts with the exception of the District of Columbia
were represented in the study.
|
Predictors
of Risk Identified
The research identified nine statistically significant and policy
relevant predictors of pretrial risk of federal criminal defendants
and developed a pretrial risk classification scheme to scale the risk
persons arrested for federal criminal offenses pose if released
pending trial. The predictors of pretrial risk are:
- whether
there were other charges pending against the defendant at the
time of arrest,
- the
number of prior misdemeanor arrests,
- the
number of prior felony arrests,
- the
number of prior failures to appear,
- whether
the defendant was employed at the time of the arrest,
- the
defendant's residency status,
- whether
the defendant suffered from substance abuse problems,
- the
nature of the primary charge, and
- whether
the primary charge was a misdemeanor or a
felony.
Efficacy of Alternatives to Detention Assessed
The efficacy of the alternatives to detention program at reducing
federal criminal justice costs - particularly costs associated with
pretrial secured detention - was also assessed. A population
most suited - both programmatically and economically - for pretrial
release with conditions of alternatives to detention was
identified. The study further identified evidence-based
practices relating to the determination of pretrial risk and recommendations
to release or detain a defendant pending trial with an emphasis on
how they relate to the assessment of pretrial risk and the
administration of the alternatives to detention program.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright Luminosity Inc., 2008-2009. All Rights Reserved.
|
|